(28-09-2014 02:15)rulo escribió:  

Cita:One of the most striking and memorable things about Code Complete, even to this day, is that Coding Horror illustration in the sidebar. Every time I saw it on the page, I would chuckle. Not because of other people's code, mind you. Because of my own code. That was the revelation. You're an amateur developer until you realize that everything you write sucks.

YOU are the Coding Horror.

---

no puede ser que esto exista, y sea oficial

Cita:Cowen forecasts that modern economies are delaminating into two groups: a small minority of highly educated and capable of working collaboratively with automated systems will become a wealthy aristocracy; the vast majority will earn little or nothing, surviving on low-priced goods created by the first group, living in shantytowns working with highly automated production systems.[2] About 60% of the jobs lost during the 2008 recession were in mid-wage occupations. US Median male wages declined by about 28% between 1969 and 2009, with no obvious disaster to blame.[3]

Cowen claims that this future is foreshadowed by the recent evolution of chess from a game played by brilliant iconoclasts into freestyle chess, a team sport that relies on the creative use of advanced chess-playing software.[2]

Cowen celebrates the arrival of functional online education, mostly because it allows a much broader audience to keep up with rapid change at a price that everyone can afford and leverages the same sort of self-teaching that drives video game players to ever-greater achievements.[2]

He sees the future role of educators as motivators rather than professors, closer to a gym membership, with (online) personal trainers. He cites Williamsburg, Brooklyn, as a place full of young threshold earners, members of the second group.[2]

In his final chapter, "A New Social Contract?," Cowen writes, "We will move from a society based on the pretense that everyone is given an okay standard of living to a society in which people are expected to fend for themselves much more than they do now."[2]

He briefly discusses some ethical issues around intelligent technology. Robocars will be more efficient, observe speed limits and be much safer. However, how they will address an ethical dilemma (e.g., save the baby or the two adults) is unknown.[3]

Cowen predicts that detailed measurements will transform services such as medical care. Patients will employ performance metrics on their doctors, while the doctors will know more about how well patients follow diet and medicine programs.[3]

Jajajaj Tyler no se parece a Tyler, eso ya son 10 puntos en contra...digamos que la cagaron desde el momento que salio como 5 años después que la peli...y fight club daba mucho más para un juego onda gta donde tenés que hacer vandalismo.

todo eso sin considerar que un videojuego para sacar plata es bastante contrario al mensaje de la película.

---

seguramente las imagenes de brad pit y edward norton eran muy caras.

(29-09-2014 13:01).py escribió:  

Es muuuuuuy bueno!

(29-09-2014 13:16)CarliiN escribió:  

(29-09-2014 13:01).py escribió:  

Es muuuuuuy bueno!

WTF es excelente....y delicioso

Me dieron unos pdf de un curso de la utn sobre programacion. LADRONES

"I fuck like I code: fast, messy and with no comments."

turbio

jajajajajajajaja

oh por dios ese payaso es peor que el de IT

Fui a Megatlón y no me gustó mucho u.u

Yo le tenía fe.

es una genialidad FireChat (o, mejor dicho, algo muy obvio que debería haber existido hace rato )

http://www.technologyreview.com/news/525...onnection/

http://gizmodo.com/protesters-are-using-...1640271776

(29-09-2014 10:00)Dem0 escribió:  todo eso sin considerar que un videojuego para sacar plata es bastante contrario al mensaje de la película.

---

seguramente las imagenes de brad pit y edward norton eran muy caras.

Después de la imagen del Che en cualquier lado nadie se espanta por esas contradicciones (¿?)